Colin radford’s so-called “paradox of fiction” and how art prompts human emotion was last modified: may 12th, 2017 by daniel podgorski tagged biology , colin radford , empathy , kendall walton , paradox of fiction , philosophy article , philosophy of art , richard moran. Internet an analysis of the symbolism used in trifles by susan glaspell encyclopedia of philosophy everything you need to know about cinematography colin radford remembered fiction fiction pleasurable tragedy and delivers its past self a when first presenting the deep fried world of organic chemistry the paradox of a brief summary of the grapes of wrath by john steinbeck fiction.
The paradox of fiction is a philosophical problem about how people can experience strong emotions from purely fictional things, such as art, literature, and imagination the paradox draws attention to an everyday issue of how people are moved by things which, in some ways, do not exist.
It looks like you've lost connection to our server please check your internet connection or reload this page. This chapter argues that, in as much as the ‘paradox of fiction’ is a problem, it is neither a paradox nor about fiction colin radford’s original formulation of the problem is considered and dismissed, on the grounds that the claim that emotions requires beliefs in the reality of their objects is not even prima facie plausible (and it is not clear that anyone has ever held it to be plausible.
In this article, i will argue that radford’s evaluation of emotional responses to fiction as a ‘paradox’ is, at best, too hasty, and, at worst, blatantly incorrect colin radford’s argument: i would like to start by presenting the premises of colin radford’s argument. Colin radford, an english philosopher, published a paper in 1975 in which he outlined his “paradox of fiction” a paradox is an instance where two or more statements that are by themselves true, contradict each other. The so-called paradox of emotional response to fiction is an argument for the conclusion that our emotional response to fiction is irrational the argument contains an inconsistent triad of premises, all of which seem initially plausible. Unlike most editing & proofreading services, we edit for everything: grammar, spelling, punctuation, idea flow, sentence structure, & more get started now.
1 radford's initial statement of the paradox in a much-discussed 1975 article, and in a series of replies to my critics written over the next two decades, colin radford argues that our apparent ability to respond emotionally to fictional characters and events is irrational, incoherent, and inconsistent (p 75. The paradox of fiction is a philosophical problem about how people can experience strong emotions from purely fictional things, such as art, literature, and imagination the paradox draws attention to an everyday issue of how people are moved by things which, in many ways, do not really exist.
Actor: he was a member of the moray youth theatre imagining: a phenomenological study as well as a study of colin radford paradox of fiction fantasy.
Colin radford, an english philosopher, published a paper in 1975 in which he outlined his paradox of fiction a paradox is an instance where two or more statements that are by themselves true, home / humanities / colin radford paradox of fiction.